A resident of the Tama 38 project in Tel Aviv claimed that she was discriminated against in relation to some of the apartment owners in the building where her apartment is located and brought her claims to the Supreme Court

Claims of violation of equality usually arise in the field of constitutional law. But not only.

A resident of the Tama 38 project in Tel Aviv claimed that she was discriminated against in relation to some of the apartment owners in the building where her apartment is located and brought her claims to the Supreme Court.

Adv. Reut Glick of our firm’s Real Estate Department reviewed this ruling for Globes newspaper.

It may be a graphic element of the Western Wall, and a text that says: ‘Taxation and Justice, Globe Ruling, Attorney Reut Glick Bohnik, Examining the Injury, Shurar Yoshvim, a resident of the Tama 38 project, claimed that she was discriminated against, and reached the Supreme Court. What did the court rule? A tenant argued that because her apartment is medium sized, she receives less compensation than the owners of the large mucuses in the project, she refused to sign and the court was forced to consider the question of what is the relevant test for determining the economic consideration and the apartments The relevant interpretation determined by the tenant, the meters that wafer the areas that there is no how? She was discriminated against.

For the full article in Globes click here